- Ultimately, for US consumers, the key grocery influences focus on “better for me” choices that are quality, “close to natural” with no additives and high nutrient quality. Connecting sustainability to 'healthier' is very important in this market.
- This is a less mature sustainability market, as consumers believe that their choices have limited impact on the environment compared to European consumers. Sustainability ranks relatively low as a grocery influencer and shoppers are less likely to make changes towards a more sustainable lifestyle.
- As we see elsewhere, low/ no carbon footprint, sustainable packaging and the ecosystem/ biodiversity are strongly connected to sustainability, but are not grocery influencers. Food waste and naturalness are the critical sustainability drivers.
Of US consumers have made an effort to eat more healthily in the last 12 months, level with the global average
Believe that the choices they make on what they eat has a negative impact on the environment, significantly lower than the global average
57% of consumers say that
they don’t pay too much attention to sustainability, significantly higher than the global average
- When it comes to choosing beef, grass-fed and quality assurance are top influences, but the use of antibiotics in this market are more important than most other markets. These alongside animal welfare claims show potential to differentiate beef. Grass-fed can tap into this desire for naturalness and high welfare.
- Dairy shares many of these priorities; quality, welfare, minimising antibiotics. However, grass-fed seems somewhat less important in this sector with more of a connection needed to be made between the animal feed and the quality of the finished product.
- Sustainable packaging comes to the fore as a premium driver when it comes to PCF and alcohol, along with safety and quality reassurance.
Of US beef buyers are willing to pay a premium for beef that is grass-fed, more than any other sustainability attribute